Can students use any news source they want?

Decide that before the assignment goes out and put the rule in writing. The rubric grades whether the source is an identifiable news organization reporting a recent event, cited fully enough to find — not whether you or the student agrees with the outlet. If you want to restrict students to a set list of publications, say so in the assignment and grade the restriction inside the source row.

How recent does 'current' have to be?

Set a specific window — the last 7 days and the last 14 days are both common — and state it in the assignment. The rubric's source row already scores an article from outside the window at the Developing level, so you do not need a separate rule; you just have to tell students what the window is.

What if a student picks a distressing or politically charged story?

The rubric grades the handling, not the topic. 'Separating reporting from opinion' and 'Context & missing perspectives' are the rows that do the work on a contested story — a student who reports accurately and names what the article left out scores well regardless of which side the article came from. If certain topics are off limits in your classroom, say so in the assignment rather than at grading time.

How is this different from a reading response rubric?

A reading response grades a student's engagement with a text they were assigned. Here the student chooses the text, so source quality is graded, and the account has to be factually accurate rather than personally interesting — which is why the summary and source rows carry weight a reading response rubric does not have.

Current Events Rubric Template

A ready-to-use, analytic current events rubric for Current events assignment based on a recent news article (Grades 5–12). Score whether the student actually read a real, recent news article and can separate what it reported from what they think about it — not whether they picked an interesting story. Edit it for your own assignment, print it, download it as a Word file, or share a link with your students.

Edit this template in the maker →

The current events rubric

Criterion	Excellent (4)	Proficient (3)	Developing (2)	Beginning (1)
Source quality & citation	The article comes from an identifiable news organization, falls inside the assigned time window, and is cited with headline, outlet, author, and date, so the teacher could find it in one search.	A real news article from inside the time window is cited, but one identifying detail — usually the author or the exact date — is missing.	The source is a real article but sits outside the assigned time window, is an opinion column treated as reporting, or is cited by headline alone with no outlet or date.	No source is identified, or the item is a social media post, a search-result snippet, or a page with no named news organization behind it.
Accuracy & completeness of the summary	The summary states who was involved, what happened, when and where it happened, and what the article says is at stake, in the student's own words, and every statement matches the article.	The summary covers what happened and most surrounding facts; one element such as the location, the timing, or a party involved is left out or stated imprecisely.	The summary restates the headline and one or two details, leaving a reader unclear on what actually happened, or it borrows the article's phrasing without quoting it.	The summary misstates what the article reported, or it is a single sentence that mostly repeats the headline.
Separating reporting from opinion	Facts from the article and the student's own reaction stay clearly separate — claims are attributed to the article or its sources, and the student's views are marked as their own in wording a reader can spot.	The two are mostly separate; one opinion is written as though it came from the article, or one fact appears with no attribution.	Reporting and reaction blend together through most of the response, so a reader cannot tell which claims the article actually made.	The response is almost entirely the student's opinion of the topic, with little indication of what the article itself said.
Analysis & significance	Explains who is affected and how, and connects the event to a larger pattern, a course topic, or a consequence that could follow, with reasoning tied to specific details from the article.	Explains why the event matters and names who is affected, but the reasoning stops at one step — a consequence or connection is asserted rather than explained.	States that the topic is important or interesting without saying for whom or why, or makes a connection that does not follow from what the article reported.	No attempt to explain significance; the response ends with the summary or with a general statement about the subject area.
Context & missing perspectives	Identifies at least one perspective, party, or piece of background the article did not cover, and explains specifically what a reader would still need to know to judge the story fairly.	Names a missing perspective or an open question, but describes it in general terms rather than explaining what difference the missing information would make.	Says there is more to the story without saying what, or raises a question the article already answered.	Treats the single article as the complete account, with nothing to suggest anything is missing or contested.

Four levels — Excellent (4) to Beginning (1). Print this page, or open it in the editor to change the wording, levels, or points.

How to use this rubric

A current events assignment is one of the easiest things to hand in without doing — skim a headline, write three sentences about how it feels, and the page looks full. This rubric grades the two places that shortcut shows up: whether the summary contains what actually happened (who, what, when, where, and what is at stake), and whether the student can tell you which sentences came from the article and which came from them. The source row is deliberately strict about outlet, author, and date, because a surprising share of weak responses trace back to grading an opinion column or a year-old article as news.

Why these criteria

Each row targets something the assignment is really teaching, with descriptors written to be observable rather than vague:

Source quality & citation: Half the problems in a current events assignment start with the source — an opinion column, an aggregator summary, or an article from two years ago will produce a weak response no matter how carefully the student writes it up.
Accuracy & completeness of the summary: This row checks whether someone who never read the article could understand what happened from the summary alone — the usual failure is retelling the headline plus one detail.
Separating reporting from opinion: The skill this assignment is really teaching is telling the difference between what a source reported and what the reader concluded, so that line is graded on its own rather than buried in a writing-quality row.
Analysis & significance: Grades whether the student explained why the story matters to anyone beyond the people named in it, instead of ending on a sentence saying the topic is important.
Context & missing perspectives: One article rarely tells the whole story, and noticing what it left out is the habit that keeps a student from treating a single source as settled fact.

How to adapt it

For a weekly current events log rather than a one-off response, drop 'Context & missing perspectives' and add a row on whether the articles chosen across the term cover a range of topics instead of the same running story every week.
For a class where students present their article aloud, keep these five rows for the written portion and add a delivery row borrowed from the Speech Rubric — otherwise a confident presenter with a thin summary scores higher than the assignment intends.
For grades 5–6, replace 'Separating reporting from opinion' with a simpler requirement: the student labels one sentence as a fact taken from the article and one as their own opinion, and both labels are correct.

Frequently asked questions

Can students use any news source they want?: Decide that before the assignment goes out and put the rule in writing. The rubric grades whether the source is an identifiable news organization reporting a recent event, cited fully enough to find — not whether you or the student agrees with the outlet. If you want to restrict students to a set list of publications, say so in the assignment and grade the restriction inside the source row.
How recent does 'current' have to be?: Set a specific window — the last 7 days and the last 14 days are both common — and state it in the assignment. The rubric's source row already scores an article from outside the window at the Developing level, so you do not need a separate rule; you just have to tell students what the window is.
What if a student picks a distressing or politically charged story?: The rubric grades the handling, not the topic. 'Separating reporting from opinion' and 'Context & missing perspectives' are the rows that do the work on a contested story — a student who reports accurately and names what the article left out scores well regardless of which side the article came from. If certain topics are off limits in your classroom, say so in the assignment rather than at grading time.
How is this different from a reading response rubric?: A reading response grades a student's engagement with a text they were assigned. Here the student chooses the text, so source quality is graded, and the account has to be factually accurate rather than personally interesting — which is why the summary and source rows carry weight a reading response rubric does not have.

More rubric templates

DBQ Rubric Template →
Document-based question essays, AP / IB / honors history.
LEQ Rubric Template →
AP history long essay questions (LEQ) for APUSH, AP World, and AP Euro, grades 10–12.
Model UN Rubric Template →
Model UN delegate performance and resolutions, grades 8–12.
Timeline Project Rubric Template →
Timelines of historical, scientific, or literary events, grades 5–12.

Rubric Template for Word →
Download any rubric as an editable Word file.
Blank Rubric Template →
Print an empty rubric or build one from scratch.
All 60+ Rubric Templates →
Browse every template by subject.